![]() 380 guns being very small pistols provides a huge advantage for everyday carry (EDC). ![]() 380, the size and the caliber of the bullet are both a pro and a con. It was also adopted by various military and law enforcement agencies around the world.įor the. It was first presented in 1908 by Colt, in their 1908 Hammerless Semi-Automatic pistol. 380 was designed as a defensive round, with a concealed carry gun in mind. And of course, for creating the venerable Colt 1911.įrom the very beginning, the. Among other things, he is responsible for the creation of the lever-action rifle, pump-action shotgun, and semi- or auto-loading guns. 380 ACP was designed by none other than legendary gunsmith and firearms engineer, John Moses Browning. 380 bullets with a small “pocket” pistol. In measuring terminal ballistics in any round of any caliber, one variable will always become the constant: shot placement. There are so many factors and variables in defining “stopping power,” that a true determination does not exist. It creates a larger wound track, more internal trauma, and is far less likely to over-penetrate and leave the body of the intended target. For defensive purposes, JHP ammo is always preferable. Meaning, using an FMJ (full-metal jacket) round or “ball” ammo, or using a JHP (jacketed hollow point) round. One consideration that must be taken into account for any pistol caliber decision, is the type of round. Multiple studies over multiple years by multiple law enforcement agencies, cannot and do not come to a consensus. Even then, it’s not 100 percent guaranteed. In almost any scenario, instant incapacitation would require a headshot or a well-placed shot to the Central Nervous System (the brain or the upper spine). Also, “incapacitate” does not mean “kill,” so it’s important to make the distinction. On average, according to FBI statistics, it takes at least three rounds to kill or fully incapacitate an attacker - in any caliber. This is especially true in the world of handguns, civilian defensive shootings, law enforcement, and supported by years and years’ worth of data. As is the notion of “one shot, one kill,” or dropping someone instantly in their tracks with a big bullet. Especially when it’s about training, tactics, or things that can amount to life and death. I love being the bearer of accurate information and setting the record straight. I hate to be the bearer of bad news… Actually, I don’t. And I will dispel a few myths at the same time. What I will do is point you in the right direction and give the best recommendation possible. I might not solve this debate for you here. Let’s load up a few magazines’ worth of information, and dive into some background on all these points. 44 Magnum, etc, it’s not worth consideration because it lacks “stopping power.” If that is true, then both. Until not too long ago, the popular saying within the firearms community was “if there isn’t a ‘4’ in front, it’s worthless.” Or some variation along those lines. I also hear that question a lot within the conversation about which are the best handguns for women. With that said, the question remains of what is better in the consideration of. 380 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol), versus the 9mm NATO (also known as 9mm Luger and 9mm Parabellum).Īs popular guns chambered in 9mm like the Glock 19, the Sig P320, and the FN 509 have set the standard for modern semi-autos, it’s almost as if the market has settled the debate. 380 vs 9mm still exists, and one I hear all the time. Should other calibers also be considered? The debate between. Even more to the point today, 9mm has become more or less the default caliber for most handguns and everyday carry (EDC) options. ![]() Both of those guns are chambered for 9mm, so it’s an orange-to-orange comparison. Like the Glock 19 versus the Sig P320, for example. ![]() Who doesn’t love a good debate? The firearms community is full of them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |